Flagship: Noise-Stationary Locking
Quantum-grade measurement stability for interferometric optical sensors — the first and most developed module, detailed throughout this site.
Advanced Supervisory Modules · measurement-aware interferometry
Conventional locks keep an instrument optically stable. PQSensing builds Advanced Supervisory Modules — a firmware performance layer that asks a harder question: is the instrument parked where it produces the most usable measurement information? Our flagship module brings this to quantum-grade optical sensing, and the family extends across inertial, timing, and quantum-communications instruments.
The platform
Across precision instruments — interferometric optical sensors, inertial and fiber-optic gyros, frequency references and optical clocks, quantum links — the limiting factor is rarely whether the device is locked. It is whether it is held at the operating point where its numbers are actually best. PQSensing packages that discipline as a family of Advanced Supervisory Modules: a firmware layer that runs alongside your existing lock and keeps the instrument parked where the measurement is cleanest.
Quantum-grade measurement stability for interferometric optical sensors — the first and most developed module, detailed throughout this site.
Further modules target inertial sensing, optical clocks and frequency references, and quantum communications — each tuned to the figure of merit that matters for that instrument class.
Delivered as firmware for standard FPGA-based lab instruments, including Liquid Instruments Moku and Red Pitaya — deployed alongside the locks already on the box.
Seeking collaboration
PQSensing is looking for a university lab, metrology partner, instrument company, or technical sponsor to help test Noise-Stationary Locking on a classical tabletop interferometer.
The first experiment is deliberately modest: compare a conventional PDH, power, or PID-style lock against a normalized noise-objective lock under controlled vibration, thermal drift, and phase/path-length disturbance.
What we need: access to an optical bench or Mach-Zehnder/cavity test setup, photodetector readout, a PZT or phase actuator, DAQ/controller support, and technical guidance on a defensible validation protocol.
What partners get: a focused applied optics/control project, possible student-useful data, early visibility into Kansas-origin photonics IP, and a clear sponsored-research or prototype path if the traces are interesting.
Why this exists
Most precision interferometers are locked to an optical condition: a cavity resonance, a fringe point, a reflected-power null, or a transmitted-power peak. That is necessary, but it is not always enough.
The customer does not buy a pretty fringe. The customer buys a smaller error bar: displacement, phase, strain, rotation, acceleration, refractive index, or timing measured with less uncertainty and less wasted integration time.
NSL + DPI is for instruments that are optically locked but not necessarily measurement-optimized. The optical lock says stable. The noise floor says otherwise.
The buyer pain
That is the use case. The lock is holding the optics, but vibration, thermal drift, laser-frequency noise, platform motion, speckle, detuning jitter, or quadrature-angle error still corrupt the measurement band.
Integration time should shrink the error bar. When the operating point drifts or the noise becomes nonstationary, longer averaging can collect drift instead of information.
Squeezed-light benefit depends on alignment, loss, and phase stability. A squeezed source is not enough if the readout drifts away from the low-variance quadrature.
A nominally dark port can be more than an empty input. DPI turns it into a controlled channel for calibration, coding, ranging, interference rejection, and squeezed-light injection.
What we are doing
NSL + DPI is intended to augment established optical locking methods such as PDH, not pick a needless fight with them. PDH keeps the cavity or interferometer captured. NSL trims the operating point toward the quietest useful measurement condition. DPI gives the dark port a controlled job.
Use PDH, bias locking, or another conventional method to maintain optical capture and keep the instrument in range.
Compute normalized measurement-band noise and servo the system toward a point where small detuning errors no longer cause first-order noise degradation.
Inject a controlled auxiliary field, phase code, pilot signal, or squeezed vacuum through the dark mode and recover useful signatures at the output.
Interactive demonstration
A power lock parks at the fringe extremum. A noise-stationary lock parks where the slope of Vnorm(δ) = Nband(δ) / P(δ)k goes to zero. Whenever real-world noise has structure that isn't perfectly aligned with the fringe — which it rarely does — those two operating points are not the same. Drag the controls.
Pedagogical model, not bench data. Analytic curves illustrate the slope-null thesis. The validation sprint replaces these with measured curves from a tabletop Mach–Zehnder.
Why optimize variance?
For a photon-limited phase measurement, the useful relationship is:
Lower and more stable Vnorm means the same photon flux and integration time produce a smaller phase-error variance. That can mean better precision in the same time, the same precision faster, or the same result with less optical power.
How we intend to do it
Read the detector stream y(t) from a photodiode, balanced detector, homodyne receiver, or related interferometric readout.
Estimate band-limited noise Nband, compute an optical power metric P, and form the normalized objective.
Apply a small operating-point dither to δ outside the protected measurement band to probe the objective’s slope.
Synchronously demodulate Vnorm against the dither reference to estimate dVnorm/dδ.
Drive the actuator toward dVnorm/dδ ≈ 0 while preserving a power floor and using mislock recovery logic.
Hold the quietest useful operating point so photon integration continues to reduce the measurement error bar.
Vnorm(δ) = Nband(δ) / P(δ)k + power-floor penalty
dVnorm/dδ → 0
Phase-Controlled Dark-Mode Injection
In a conventional interferometer, the dark input is often treated as unused or as a passive vacuum input. DPI uses that port intentionally. A known phase waveform g(t), pilot signal, code, chirp, coherent auxiliary field, or squeezed vacuum can be injected and recovered through synchronous detection, correlation, matched filtering, or homodyne readout.
What can this help measure?
If the physical quantity can be converted into an optical phase, path-length, quadrature, or time-delay change, NSL + DPI may help move it from “buried in noise” to “recoverable with usable integration time.”
Mirror motion, MEMS motion, wafer-stage position, precision machine vibration, optomechanical displacement.
Fiber strain, structural deformation, composite stress, shape sensing, pressure-vessel or pipeline strain.
Proof-mass motion, cantilever force, membrane pressure, acoustic diaphragm motion, hydrophone-style sensing.
Sagnac-style rotation, fiber gyro readout, GPS-denied navigation support, platform stabilization.
Trace gas, fluid contamination, biosensing, lab-on-chip refractive-index shifts, molecular binding effects.
Sub-shot-noise phase shifts, squeezed-light readout, low-variance quadrature tracking, dark-port quantum resources.
Dark-port code recovery, matched-filter timing, correlation peaks, multiplexed instrument identification.
Not magic. Not “measure anything.” The claim is sharper: preserve the measurement condition so small interferometric signals can be recovered sooner and with less noise-floor wandering.
Validation plan
The first milestone is intentionally lean. No squeezed-light source is required to validate the core control principle. Build a classical MZI, sweep the operating point, map power and Vnorm, inject controlled detuning jitter, and compare a conventional power lock against NSL.
Prototype metrics
These are validation targets, not guaranteed product specifications. The point is to produce defensible traces that prove or kill the control thesis.
Market wedge
Metrology OEMs: cavities, mode cleaners, MZI/Michelson platforms, displacement and precision phase sensors.
Defense and navigation: inertial sensing, gyro readout, platform vibration, GPS-denied measurement support.
Photonics and integrated sensing: MZI/PIC control firmware, dark-port coding, correlation signatures, interference rejection.
Quantum-sensing labs and partners: squeezed-light injection, quadrature alignment, homodyne readout, practical quantum advantage.
Audio overview
A concise spoken overview of the PQSensing approach, the tabletop validation sprint, and why noise-stationary control matters for interferometric metrology.
Immediate ask
The first funding unit is not a full quantum hardware build. It is a lean classical MZI validation package: optical bench or partner lab access, detector/readout path, actuator, DSP, jitter injection, and reproducible data comparing conventional locking against NSL.
Optics + mechanics: breadboard, mirrors, beamsplitters, mounts, alignment hardware.
Readout + control: photodiode or balanced detector path, DAQ/interface, PZT/phase actuator, driver.
DSP + analysis: real-time Vnorm pipeline, dither/demod loop, reproducible notebooks.
Output: raw logs, plots, updated deck, technical package for companies, SBIR/STTR, investors, and lab partners.